You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Review each group below. If the resources are intentionally separate, check the box to mark them as accepted. These will be excluded from future reports.
Potential Duplicates
Group 1: Caveman Mode β Agent + Instruction with Word-for-Word Identical Description (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 5)
Reviewed β these are intentionally separate
Resource
Type
Description
agents/caveman-mode.agent.md
Agent
Terse, low-token responses. Minimal words, no fluff. Full capabilities preserved.
instructions/caveman-mode.instructions.md
Instruction
Terse, low-token responses. Minimal words, no fluff. Full capabilities preserved.
Why flagged: Word-for-word identical description. Same communication directives in both files. The agent is explicitly invoked; the instruction applies passively via applyTo: '**'. Both exist simultaneously and may conflict.
Group 2: Implementation Plan Generation Agents β Identical Descriptions (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 4)
Reviewed β these are intentionally separate
Resource
Type
Description
agents/planner.agent.md
Agent
Generate an implementation plan for new features or refactoring existing code.
agents/implementation-plan.agent.md
Agent
Generate an implementation plan for new features or refactoring existing code.
Why flagged: Both agents share a word-for-word identical description. Two agents with the same stated purpose and same description coexist in the repository.
Group 3: Mentoring Juniors β Agent + Skill with Near-Identical Socratic Approach (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 1)
Reviewed β these are intentionally separate
Resource
Type
Description
agents/mentoring-juniors.agent.md
Agent
Socratic mentor for junior developers. Guides through questions, never gives direct answers. Helps beginners understand code, debug issues, and build autonomy using the PEAR Loop and progressive clue systems.
skills/mentoring-juniors/SKILL.md
Skill
Socratic mentoring for junior developers and AI newcomers. Guides through questions, never answers. Progressive clue systems, teaching techniques, and success metrics.
Why flagged: Both share the same name (mentoring-juniors), same Socratic guiding approach (questions only, never direct answers), same target audience (junior devs), and similar progressive clue/hint systems. The core behaviour is packaged as both an agent and a skill.
Group 4: Quality Playbook β Agent + Skill with Near-Identical Six-Phase Audit (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 2)
Reviewed β these are intentionally separate
Resource
Type
Description
agents/quality-playbook.agent.md
Agent
Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Orchestrates six phases β explore, generate, review, audit, reconcile, verify β each in its own context window for maximum depth. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch.
skills/quality-playbook/SKILL.md
Skill
Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements, generates spec-traced functional tests, runs a three-pass code review, executes a multi-model spec audit (Council of Three), and produces a consolidated bug report with TDD-verified patches. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch.
Why flagged: Both share the same name (quality-playbook), the same opening claim, and the distinctive "35% of real defects" statistic. Same audit methodology, different resource types.
Group 5: Doublecheck β Agent + Skill with Identical Three-Layer Pipeline (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 7)
Reviewed β these are intentionally separate
Resource
Type
Description
agents/doublecheck.agent.md
Agent
Interactive verification agent for AI-generated output. Runs a three-layer pipeline (self-audit, source verification, adversarial review) and produces structured reports with source links for human review.
skills/doublecheck/SKILL.md
Skill
Three-layer verification pipeline for AI output. Extracts verifiable claims, finds supporting or contradicting sources via web search, runs adversarial review for hallucination patterns, and produces a structured verification report with source links for human review.
Why flagged: Both describe the exact same three-layer verification pipeline for AI-generated output. Differ only in resource type (agent vs skill).
Group 6: PRD β Agent + Skill (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 9)
Reviewed β these are intentionally separate
Resource
Type
Description
agents/prd.agent.md
Agent
Generate a comprehensive Product Requirements Document (PRD) in Markdown, detailing user stories, acceptance criteria, technical considerations, and metrics.
skills/prd/SKILL.md
Skill
Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features. Includes executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.
Why flagged: Same name (prd), same core purpose β generating PRD documents with user stories and acceptance criteria. Cross-type overlap (agent vs skill).
Group 7: Code Tour β Agent + Skill with Identical Purpose (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 19)
Reviewed β these are intentionally separate
Resource
Type
Description
agents/code-tour.agent.md
Agent
Expert agent for creating and maintaining VSCode CodeTour files with comprehensive schema support and best practices.
skills/code-tour/SKILL.md
Skill
Use this skill to create CodeTour .tour files β persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs that link to real files and line numbers.
Why flagged: Both create VSCode CodeTour .tour files for the same use cases. Core purpose is identical; differ only in resource type.
Group 8: Gilfoyle Code Review β Agent + Instruction (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 8)
Reviewed β these are intentionally separate
Resource
Type
Description
agents/gilfoyle.agent.md
Agent
Code review and analysis with the sardonic wit and technical elitism of Bertram Gilfoyle from Silicon Valley.
instructions/gilfoyle-code-review.instructions.md
Instruction
Gilfoyle-style code review instructions that channel the sardonic technical supremacy of Silicon Valley's most arrogant systems architect.
Why flagged: Same Gilfoyle persona, same code review domain. One performs active review sessions; the other passively applies the same style to all interactions.
Group 9: Context7 β Agent + Instruction (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 11)
Reviewed β these are intentionally separate
Resource
Type
Description
agents/context7.agent.md
Agent
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation via Context7 MCP.
instructions/context7.instructions.md
Instruction
Use Context7 for authoritative external docs and API references when local context is insufficient.
Why flagged: Identical name, nearly identical scope (using Context7 MCP for documentation lookup). Differ only in resource type.
Group 10: Markdown Accessibility β Agent + Instruction (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 12)
Reviewed β these are intentionally separate
Resource
Type
Description
agents/markdown-accessibility-assistant.agent.md
Agent
Improves the accessibility of markdown files using five GitHub best practices.
Markdown accessibility guidelines based on GitHub's 5 best practices for inclusive documentation.
Why flagged: Both reference the same source (GitHub's 5 best practices for markdown accessibility). Identical domain and source material, cross-type overlap.
Group 11: C#/.NET Janitor Cluster β Two Agents with Identical Descriptions + Universal Variant (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 6)
Reviewed β these are intentionally separate
Resource
Type
Description
agents/csharp-dotnet-janitor.agent.md
Agent
Perform janitorial tasks on C#/.NET code including cleanup, modernization, and tech debt remediation.
agents/dotnet-upgrade.agent.md
Agent
Perform janitorial tasks on C#/.NET code including cleanup, modernization, and tech debt remediation.
agents/janitor.agent.md
Agent
Perform janitorial tasks on any codebase including cleanup, simplification, and tech debt remediation.
Why flagged:csharp-dotnet-janitor and dotnet-upgrade share a word-for-word identical description. janitor.agent.md broadens the same workflow to any language, potentially making both C#-specific agents redundant.
Group 12: MS-SQL DBA β Agent + Instruction with Same Scope (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 10)
Reviewed β these are intentionally separate
Resource
Type
Description
agents/ms-sql-dba.agent.md
Agent
Work with Microsoft SQL Server databases using the MS SQL extension.
instructions/ms-sql-dba.instructions.md
Instruction
Instructions for customizing GitHub Copilot behavior for MS-SQL DBA chat mode.
Why flagged: The instruction explicitly targets use alongside the ms-sql-dba agent, creating heavily overlapping content for the same SQL Server DBA use case.
Group 13: Power BI Expert Agents vs Power BI Best Practices Instructions β Cross-Type Cluster (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 3)
Reviewed β these are intentionally separate
Resource
Type
Description
agents/power-bi-data-modeling-expert.agent.md
Agent
Expert Power BI data modeling guidance using star schema principles, relationship design, and Microsoft best practices.
Comprehensive Power BI data modeling best practices based on Microsoft guidance for creating efficient, scalable semantic models using star schema principles.
agents/power-bi-dax-expert.agent.md
Agent
Expert Power BI DAX guidance using Microsoft best practices for performance, readability, and maintainability of DAX formulas.
Comprehensive Power BI report design and visualization best practices based on Microsoft guidance for creating effective, accessible, and performant reports and dashboards.
Why flagged: Three agent+instruction pairs covering the same Power BI sub-domains. Each pair shares 85%+ similar scope, differing only in resource type.
Group 14: Azure Functions vs Durable Functions C# β Near-Identical Instructions (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 13)
Guidelines and best practices for building Azure Durable Functions in C# using the isolated worker model.
Why flagged: Descriptions are 95%+ identical (only difference is "Durable"), same applyTo patterns, closely overlapping content. Durable Functions is a specific extension of Azure Functions and may warrant a merged instruction.
Group 15: Azure Logic Apps β Agent + Instruction Cross-Type Overlap (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 16)
Reviewed β these are intentionally separate
Resource
Type
Description
agents/azure-logic-apps-expert.agent.md
Agent
Expert guidance for Azure Logic Apps development focusing on workflow design, integration patterns, and JSON-based Workflow Definition Language.
Guidelines for developing Azure Logic Apps and Power Automate workflows with best practices for Workflow Definition Language (WDL), integration patterns, and enterprise automation.
Why flagged: Both target Azure Logic Apps development with the same focus areas: Workflow Definition Language, integration patterns, and enterprise automation.
Group 16: Declarative Agents β Instruction + Skill Cross-Type Overlap (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 17)
Comprehensive development guidelines for Microsoft 365 Copilot declarative agents with schema v1.5, TypeSpec integration, and Microsoft 365 Agents Toolkit workflows.
skills/declarative-agents/SKILL.md
Skill
Complete development kit for Microsoft 365 Copilot declarative agents with three comprehensive workflows (basic, advanced, validation), TypeSpec support, and Microsoft 365 Agents Toolkit integration.
Why flagged: Both cover M365 Copilot declarative agent development with the same technologies: TypeSpec, M365 Agents Toolkit, schema v1.5.
Group 17: Prompt Engineering Safety β Instruction + Skill Cross-Type Overlap (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 18)
Comprehensive AI prompt engineering safety review and improvement prompt. Analyzes prompts for safety, bias, security vulnerabilities, and hallucination risks.
Why flagged: Both cover AI prompt engineering safety with the same focus areas (bias mitigation, safety frameworks, security).
Group 18: Spring Data Cosmos Migration β Two Source Databases, Same Target (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 15)
Step-by-step guide for converting Spring Boot JPA applications to use Azure Cosmos DB with Spring Data Cosmos.
Why flagged: Both describe a "step-by-step guide for converting Spring Boot X applications to use Azure Cosmos DB with Spring Data Cosmos" β identical structure and migration target, differing only in source data layer.
Group 19: Dataverse Python β Advanced Patterns vs Production Code Skills (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 14)
Generate production code for Dataverse SDK using advanced patterns, error handling, and optimization techniques.
skills/dataverse-python-production-code/SKILL.md
Skill
Generate production-ready Python code using Dataverse SDK with error handling, optimization, and best practices.
Why flagged: Both generate production-ready Python code for the same Dataverse SDK with the same themes (error handling, retry logic, OData optimization). Descriptions differ only in wording.
Group 20: Suggest Awesome Copilot Resources β Three Near-Identical Skills (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 20)
Suggest relevant GitHub Copilot skills from the awesome-copilot repository based on current repository context and chat history.
Why flagged: Three skills with nearly identical structure and wording β differing only in the resource type they suggest (agents vs instructions vs skills). Could potentially be a single parameterized skill.
Summary
How to Use This Report
Review each group below. If the resources are intentionally separate, check the box to mark them as accepted. These will be excluded from future reports.
Potential Duplicates
Group 1: Caveman Mode β Agent + Instruction with Word-for-Word Identical Description (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 5)
agents/caveman-mode.agent.mdinstructions/caveman-mode.instructions.mdWhy flagged: Word-for-word identical description. Same communication directives in both files. The agent is explicitly invoked; the instruction applies passively via
applyTo: '**'. Both exist simultaneously and may conflict.Group 2: Implementation Plan Generation Agents β Identical Descriptions (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 4)
agents/planner.agent.mdagents/implementation-plan.agent.mdWhy flagged: Both agents share a word-for-word identical description. Two agents with the same stated purpose and same description coexist in the repository.
Group 3: Mentoring Juniors β Agent + Skill with Near-Identical Socratic Approach (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 1)
agents/mentoring-juniors.agent.mdskills/mentoring-juniors/SKILL.mdWhy flagged: Both share the same name (
mentoring-juniors), same Socratic guiding approach (questions only, never direct answers), same target audience (junior devs), and similar progressive clue/hint systems. The core behaviour is packaged as both an agent and a skill.Group 4: Quality Playbook β Agent + Skill with Near-Identical Six-Phase Audit (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 2)
agents/quality-playbook.agent.mdskills/quality-playbook/SKILL.mdWhy flagged: Both share the same name (
quality-playbook), the same opening claim, and the distinctive "35% of real defects" statistic. Same audit methodology, different resource types.Group 5: Doublecheck β Agent + Skill with Identical Three-Layer Pipeline (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 7)
agents/doublecheck.agent.mdskills/doublecheck/SKILL.mdWhy flagged: Both describe the exact same three-layer verification pipeline for AI-generated output. Differ only in resource type (agent vs skill).
Group 6: PRD β Agent + Skill (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 9)
agents/prd.agent.mdskills/prd/SKILL.mdWhy flagged: Same name (
prd), same core purpose β generating PRD documents with user stories and acceptance criteria. Cross-type overlap (agent vs skill).Group 7: Code Tour β Agent + Skill with Identical Purpose (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 19)
agents/code-tour.agent.mdskills/code-tour/SKILL.mdWhy flagged: Both create VSCode CodeTour
.tourfiles for the same use cases. Core purpose is identical; differ only in resource type.Group 8: Gilfoyle Code Review β Agent + Instruction (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 8)
agents/gilfoyle.agent.mdinstructions/gilfoyle-code-review.instructions.mdWhy flagged: Same Gilfoyle persona, same code review domain. One performs active review sessions; the other passively applies the same style to all interactions.
Group 9: Context7 β Agent + Instruction (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 11)
agents/context7.agent.mdinstructions/context7.instructions.mdWhy flagged: Identical name, nearly identical scope (using Context7 MCP for documentation lookup). Differ only in resource type.
Group 10: Markdown Accessibility β Agent + Instruction (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 12)
agents/markdown-accessibility-assistant.agent.mdinstructions/markdown-accessibility.instructions.mdWhy flagged: Both reference the same source (GitHub's 5 best practices for markdown accessibility). Identical domain and source material, cross-type overlap.
Group 11: C#/.NET Janitor Cluster β Two Agents with Identical Descriptions + Universal Variant (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 6)
agents/csharp-dotnet-janitor.agent.mdagents/dotnet-upgrade.agent.mdagents/janitor.agent.mdWhy flagged:
csharp-dotnet-janitoranddotnet-upgradeshare a word-for-word identical description.janitor.agent.mdbroadens the same workflow to any language, potentially making both C#-specific agents redundant.Group 12: MS-SQL DBA β Agent + Instruction with Same Scope (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 10)
agents/ms-sql-dba.agent.mdinstructions/ms-sql-dba.instructions.mdWhy flagged: The instruction explicitly targets use alongside the
ms-sql-dbaagent, creating heavily overlapping content for the same SQL Server DBA use case.Group 13: Power BI Expert Agents vs Power BI Best Practices Instructions β Cross-Type Cluster (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 3)
agents/power-bi-data-modeling-expert.agent.mdinstructions/power-bi-data-modeling-best-practices.instructions.mdagents/power-bi-dax-expert.agent.mdinstructions/power-bi-dax-best-practices.instructions.mdagents/power-bi-visualization-expert.agent.mdinstructions/power-bi-report-design-best-practices.instructions.mdWhy flagged: Three agent+instruction pairs covering the same Power BI sub-domains. Each pair shares 85%+ similar scope, differing only in resource type.
Group 14: Azure Functions vs Durable Functions C# β Near-Identical Instructions (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 13)
instructions/azure-functions-csharp.instructions.mdinstructions/azure-durable-functions-csharp.instructions.mdWhy flagged: Descriptions are 95%+ identical (only difference is "Durable"), same
applyTopatterns, closely overlapping content. Durable Functions is a specific extension of Azure Functions and may warrant a merged instruction.Group 15: Azure Logic Apps β Agent + Instruction Cross-Type Overlap (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 16)
agents/azure-logic-apps-expert.agent.mdinstructions/azure-logic-apps-power-automate.instructions.mdWhy flagged: Both target Azure Logic Apps development with the same focus areas: Workflow Definition Language, integration patterns, and enterprise automation.
Group 16: Declarative Agents β Instruction + Skill Cross-Type Overlap (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 17)
instructions/declarative-agents-microsoft365.instructions.mdskills/declarative-agents/SKILL.mdWhy flagged: Both cover M365 Copilot declarative agent development with the same technologies: TypeSpec, M365 Agents Toolkit, schema v1.5.
Group 17: Prompt Engineering Safety β Instruction + Skill Cross-Type Overlap (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 18)
instructions/ai-prompt-engineering-safety-best-practices.instructions.mdskills/ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review/SKILL.mdWhy flagged: Both cover AI prompt engineering safety with the same focus areas (bias mitigation, safety frameworks, security).
Group 18: Spring Data Cosmos Migration β Two Source Databases, Same Target (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 15)
instructions/convert-cassandra-to-spring-data-cosmos.instructions.mdinstructions/convert-jpa-to-spring-data-cosmos.instructions.mdWhy flagged: Both describe a "step-by-step guide for converting Spring Boot X applications to use Azure Cosmos DB with Spring Data Cosmos" β identical structure and migration target, differing only in source data layer.
Group 19: Dataverse Python β Advanced Patterns vs Production Code Skills (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 14)
skills/dataverse-python-advanced-patterns/SKILL.mdskills/dataverse-python-production-code/SKILL.mdWhy flagged: Both generate production-ready Python code for the same Dataverse SDK with the same themes (error handling, retry logic, OData optimization). Descriptions differ only in wording.
Group 20: Suggest Awesome Copilot Resources β Three Near-Identical Skills (previously reviewed β see #1867 Group 20)
skills/suggest-awesome-github-copilot-agents/SKILL.mdskills/suggest-awesome-github-copilot-instructions/SKILL.mdskills/suggest-awesome-github-copilot-skills/SKILL.mdWhy flagged: Three skills with nearly identical structure and wording β differing only in the resource type they suggest (agents vs instructions vs skills). Could potentially be a single parameterized skill.
Note
π Integrity filter blocked 2 items
The following items were blocked because they don't meet the GitHub integrity level.
issue_read: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".issue_read: has lower integrity than agent requires. The agent cannot read data with integrity below "approved".To allow these resources, lower
min-integrityin your GitHub frontmatter: