[Fix] Correct typo in task summary guidance - #1127
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
mrubens
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 6, 2026 03:08
mrubens
requested review from
brunobergher,
daniel-lxs and
mrubens
as code owners
August 6, 2026 03:08
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Corrected a high-confidence typo in the task-summary generation prompt.
Why this change was made
The prompt instructed the model to "summmarize" the final outcome. The correction keeps generated task summaries aligned with standard spelling.
Impact
No runtime behavior changes beyond the corrected prompt wording. Repository-wide typo scanning found no other high-confidence corrections in the reviewed surfaces; intentional technical names, fixtures, compatibility strings, and quoted examples were left unchanged. The targeted summary test could not start because its database setup attempted to connect to unavailable PostgreSQL at
127.0.0.1:15432; formatting, lint, type checking, pre-push checks, and the author review passed.